DRIVING FACTORS AND BARRIERS OF YOUTH PARTICIPATION IN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT: A CASE STUDY OF TOLONDADU I VILLAGE

Penulis

  • Arif Chandra Kirana Universitas bina mandiri gorontalo
  • Imam Mashudi Bina Mandiri University Gorontalo
  • Ely Ibrahim Bina Mandiri University Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47918/che45t93

Kata Kunci:

Youth Participation, Village Development, Structural Barriers, Financial Pragmatism, Karang Taruna, Collaborative Governance.

Abstrak

The strategic involvement of young people is essential for sustainable rural development, yet their participation is often constrained by various structural and personal challenges. This study aims to analyze: (1) the factors driving youth participation in local governance, (2) the barriers hindering their involvement, and (3) the collaborative strategies developed by the village government and youth organizations to promote inclusive rural development. The research was conducted in Tolondadu I Village, Bolaang Uki District, South Bolaang Mongondow Regency, using a qualitative approach within a post-positivist paradigm. Data were collected through observation, documentation, and semi-structured in-depth interviews with three key informants selected through purposive sampling: the Village Head, Village Secretary, and Chairman of Karang Taruna. Data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method and validated through source triangulation and prolonged observation. The findings reveal that institutional inclusion serves as the main driving factor for youth participation. Democratic forums, such as Village Deliberation Meetings (Musyawarah Desa), provide opportunities for young people to actively contribute to local decision-making processes. However, youth participation remains limited due to structural barriers, including migration for education and employment, as well as personal factors such as career-oriented individualism and financial pragmatism. To address these challenges, stronger collaboration between the village government and Karang Taruna is required. The village government can support youth engagement through policies and economic programs, while Karang Taruna can utilize its social networks to align development initiatives with the aspirations and needs of young people.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Referensi

[1] O. Giwu, L. Mdoda, and S. S. Ntlanga, “Assessing the socio-economic impact of youth engagement in agricultural enterprise for employment creation and poverty alleviation,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23311886.2024.2368097.

[2] D. Nyathi, J. Ndlovu, N. Ncube, and K. Phiri, “The Dynamics of Promoting Youth Participation in Smallholder Agriculture for Sustainable Food Security in Lupane District, Zimbabwe,” in World Sustainability Series, School of Social Sciences, Howard College, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2022, pp. 245–258. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-98617-9_15.

[3] A. Arslan, D. E. Tschirley, and E.-M. Egger, “Rural Youth Welfare along the Rural-urban Gradient: An Empirical Analysis across the Developing World,” J. Dev. Stud., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 544–570, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00220388.2020.1808197.

[4] A. Carrasco Cruz, F. Cruz-Souza, and G. González-Calvo, “Roots of Rural Youth: A Five-Year Systematic Review of Place Attachment,” Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, 2025, doi: 10.3390/socsci14090554.

[5] L. N. Gataullina, G. M. Tuktarova, F. T. Nezhmetdinova, and G. R. Fassakhova, “Socialization of rural youth issues in the development of agricultural industry and society,” in BIO Web of Conferences, V. A., Z. B., N. F., T. A., and N. R., Eds., Kazan State Agrarian University, 65, K. Marx St., Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, 420015, Russian Federation: EDP Sciences, 2024. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/202410300068.

[6] R. G. McGregor, A. J. Ross, and G. Zihindula, “The socioeconomic impact of rural-origin graduates working as healthcare professionals in South Africa,” South African Fam. Pract., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 184–189, 2019, doi: 10.1080/20786190.2019.1647006.

[7] S. J. Auta, Y. M. Abdullahi, and M. Nasiru, “Rural Youths’ participation in agriculture: Prospects, challenges and the implications for policy in Nigeria,” J. Agric. Educ. Ext., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–307, 2010, doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2010.489769.

[8] N. Ćurčić, A. M. Svitlica, J. Brankov, Ž. Bjeljac, S. Pavlović, and B. Jandžiković, “The role of rural tourism in strengthening the sustainability of rural areas: The case of zlakusa village,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 12, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13126747.

[9] T. J. Setokoe, T. Ramukumba, and I. W. Ferreira, “Community participation in the development of rural areas: A leaders’ perspective of tourism,” African J. Hosp. Tour. Leis., vol. 8, no. 1, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85061837472&partnerID=40&md5=83bb4fe088211ab7c9f037abd3e034ae

[10] M. U. Mehmood, M. Luqman, and M. Yaseen, “Attitude and components of capacity building of rural youth for sustainable agricultural practices: case study of Punjab province Pakistan,” Cienc. Rural, vol. 54, no. 5, 2024, doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20230178.

[11] E. Setiadi, A. I. Sulaiman, R. Windiasih, D. Ahmadi, E. Suyanto, and I. K. Eka Wijayanti, “Important Factors in the Development of Young Entrepreneurial Groups in Forest Honeybee Cultivation and Products,” J. Ecohumanism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1196–1207, 2024, doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i3.3420.

[12] P. K. S. Praveen, M. Ramasubramanian, R. Krishnan, S. M. Kumar, and V. Saravanakumar, “Global perspectives on youth participation in agriculture: A bibliometric analysis and literature review,” Plant Sci. Today, vol. 12, no. sp1, pp. 1–11, 2025, doi: 10.14719/pst.9485.

[13] F. A. N. Datumula, “DECENTRALIZED BUSINESS IN THE BLOCKCHAIN ERA: MAPPING RESEARCH TRENDS AND IDENTIFYING FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS,” J. Econ. Bus. Adm., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 174–183, 2024.

[14] B. Jentsch, “Youth migration from rural areas: Moral principles to support youth and rural communities in policy debates,” Sociol. Ruralis, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 229–240, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00412.x.

[15] C. Trivelli and J. Morel, “Rural Youth Inclusion, Empowerment, and Participation,” J. Dev. Stud., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 635–649, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00220388.2020.1808194.

[16] A. B. H. Veitia, A. Gentile, and I. H. Moya, “Youth participation for rural development: Analysis of a cuban case in agricultural cooperatives,” REVESCO Rev. Estud. Coop., vol. 137, 2021, doi: 10.5209/REVE.73864.

[17] M. T. Lahrech et al., “Overcoming Barriers to Youth Economic Inclusion in Rural Morocco: A Case Study of Daït Aoua,” Societies, vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.3390/soc15010004.

[18] R. Baloyii, E. Wale, and U. Chipfupa, “Rural youth interest in economic activities along the agricultural value chain: empirical evidence from Kwazulu-Natal (South Africa) and implications,” Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49–65, 2023, doi: 10.22434/IFAMR2021.0036.

[19] H. P. Rambuda, E. Wale, and U. Chipfupa, “The Propensity of Rural Youth to Take Rain-Fed Smallholder Farming as Their Livelihood Strategy in KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa): A Multinomial Logit Analysis,” Poverty and Public Policy, vol. 17, no. 4, 2025, doi: 10.1002/pop4.70028.

[20] S. Trevor and J. M. Kwenye, “Rural youth participation in agriculture in Zambia,” J. Agric. Ext., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 51–61, 2018, doi: 10.4314/jae.v22i2.5.

[21] G. Vaznonien and I. Kiaušiene, “Opportunities of different generations participation in rural community activities,” Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1637–1646, 2018, doi: 10.11118/actaun201866061637.

[22] B. Olson and M. A. Brennan, “FROM COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TO COMMUNITY EMERGENCE: A Conceptual Framework and Model to Rethink Youth-Community Interaction,” in The Routledge Handbook of Community Development: Perspectives from around the Globe, Pennsylvania State University, United States: Taylor and Francis, 2017, pp. 264–278. doi: 10.4324/9781315674100-19.

[23] K. A. Rivai, A. S. Alam, and A. L. Irwan, “The role of youth in developing village,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Regional Development Planning Program / Youth Leadership Planning, Graduate School, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia: Institute of Physics Publishing, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/473/1/012022.

[24] S. Fehser, F. Tillmann, and B. Reißig, “Political participation of young people in rural Eastern Germany: empirical findings, structural barriers, and policy implications,” Front. Polit. Sci., vol. 7, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpos.2025.1620587.

[25] S. Lalitha, “Youth Participation in Community Development: Issues and Implications,” in Handbook of Youth Development: Policies and Perspectives from India and Beyond, Department of Social Work, RGNIYD, Sriperumbudur, India: Springer Nature, 2023, pp. 443–445. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-4969-4_25.

[26] J. Puđak, A. B. Tonković, and M. Kovačić, “Analysis of the Role of Youth Organizations in Rural Croatia Through the Theory of Neo-endogenous Development: Case Study on Examples in Lika-Senj and Zadar County,” Sociol. i Prost., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 287–317, 2022, doi: 10.5673/sip.60.2.4.

[27] D. Farrugia, “The mobility imperative for rural youth: the structural, symbolic and non-representational dimensions rural youth mobilities,” J. Youth Stud., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 836–851, 2016, doi: 10.1080/13676261.2015.1112886.

[28] A. F. Z. Perilla and N. A. Knobloch, “A literature review of rural youth studies in Latin America and the Caribbean during 2001-2019,” Cienc. Tecnol. Agropecu., vol. 22, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.21930/rcta.vol22_num3_art:2310.

[29] J. W. Creswell, “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.),” in Sage Publications, 2014.

[30] Sugiyono, Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Bandung: Alphabeta, 2017.

[31] L. Nikolaevna Shmigirilova, “The problem of rural youth outflow in Belgorod region (Russia),” Stanovnistvo, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 63–82, 2018, doi: 10.2298/STNV1802063S.

[32] S. Rakshit et al., “Empowerment of Rural Women and Youth Retention as Drivers of the Agricultural Economy,” in Indian Agriculture: Challenges, Priorities and Solutions, ICAR-National Research Centre on Camel, Rajasthan, Bikaner, India: Springer Science+Business Media, 2025, pp. 149–181. doi: 10.1007/978-981-96-5273-0_8.

[33] B. Jivetti, W. W. Njororai, and F. Njororai, “Challenges facing rural youth and young adults and how development stakeholders can alleviate those hardships in Kenya,” Youth Voice J., vol. 6, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019766840&partnerID=40&md5=b032b09ec2592bd0b5087515185dd7c1

[34] M. Yami, S. Feleke, T. Abdoulaye, A. D. Alene, Z. Bamba, and V. Manyong, “African rural youth engagement in agribusiness: Achievements, limitations, and lessons,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11010185.

[35] M. Lin and R. V Patraporn, “The Invest in Youth Long Beach Coalition: Youth of Color at the Forefront of Anti-Racist Governance and Planning,” J. Am. Plan. Assoc., vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 540–553, 2023, doi: 10.1080/01944363.2022.2123023.

Diterbitkan

2026-06-15

Cara Mengutip

DRIVING FACTORS AND BARRIERS OF YOUTH PARTICIPATION IN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT: A CASE STUDY OF TOLONDADU I VILLAGE. (2026). Journal of Economic, Business, and Administration (JEBA), 7(2), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.47918/che45t93