Comparison of the Urine Protein Examination Results Using the Dipstick Method and The Ewitz Method at Kabila Health Center

Sintia Ma'ruf; Astria Lolo; Adnan Engelene

doi:10.47918/jhts.v3i2.340

Sintia Ma'ruf Universitas Bina Mandiri Gorontalo
Astria Lolo Universitas Bina Mandiri Gorontalo
Adnan Engelene Universitas Bina Mandiri Gorontalo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47918/jhts.v3i2.340

Keywords: Urine Protein, Dipstick Method, Ewitz Method.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in the results of urine protein examination in pregnant women using the dipstick method and the ewitz method at the Kabila Health Center, Bone Bolango district. The method used in this research is analytic observational by looking for the relationship between variables through an analysis of the data from observations in the laboratory or through observation of the analytical process. From the results of the study of 28 samples of pregnant women, it was found that there was no significant difference from the comparison of the results of urine protein examination using the dipstick method and the Ewitz method, where the p value was 1,000.

References

[1] Aditama, R.Y., Ginting, E., Syafriadi. 2019. Efektivitas Ekstrak Daun Pepaya (Carica Papaya L) sebagai inhibitor pada baja karbon AISI1020 dalam Medium Korosif NaCl3%. Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Fisika. 7940:69-76.
[2] Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Gorontalo. 2018. Laporan Provinsi Gorontalo RISKESDA. Gorontalo.
[3] Gandasoebrata, R. 2010. Penuntun laboratorium klinik. Edisi 16. Dian rakyat: Jakarta.
[4] Gandasoebrata, R. 2016. Penuntun laboratorium klinik. Cetakan keenam belas, Penerbit: Dian rakyat: Jakarta
[5] Indranila KS dan Lukitaning P. 2012. Akurasi Pemeriksaan Carik Celup pada Urinalisis Proteinuria dan Glukosuria Dibandingkan dengan Metoda Standard. Karya Tulis Ilmiah (KTI). Bag Patologi FK Universitas Diponegoro.
[6] Kementrian Kesehatan RI. 2018. Riset Kesehatan Dasar (RISKESDAS). Jakarta
[7] Kurniawan, B. 2016. Perbedaan hasil pemeriksaan protein urin metode carik celup, metode asam asetat 6%, dan metode asam sulfosalisilat 20%. Karya Tulis Ilmiah (KTI). Kementrian Kesehatan RI. Politeknik kesehatan Palembang.
[8] Kurniawan, F. B. 2015. Kimia klinik praktikum analis kesehatan. EGC: Yogyakarta
[9] Masturoh I dan Anggita NT. 2018. Metodologi penelitian kesehatan. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia : Jakarta
[10] Lyon SD, Sanderson MW, Lappin MR, dan Grauer GF. 2010. Comparison of urine dipstick. Sulfosalicylic acid, urine protein-to-creatinine ration, and species-specific ELISA methods for detection of albumin in urine samples of cast and dogs. JAVMA; 236 (8): 874-879.
[11] Ni’mah, M. 2017. Gambaran kadar hemoglobin dan protein pada ibu hamil trimester III Di Rumah Bersalin Mattiro Baji Gowa. Karya Tulis Ilmiah (KTI). Fakultas Kedokteran Dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin. Makassar
[12] Pradifta, M. 2018. Gambaran kadar protein urin pada ibu hamil trimester III menggunakan metode asam asetat 6 %. Karya Tulis Ilmiah (KTI). Program studi diploma iii analis kesehatan sekolah tinggi ilmu kesehatan insan cendekia medika, Jombang.
[13] Pujiningsih. 2010. Permasalahan kehamilan yang sering terjadi. PT. Suka Buku: Jakarta
[14] Siwi W. E, 2015. Perawatan kehamilan dan menyusui anak pertama. Pustaka baru press: Yogyakarta
[15] Sriwidadi, T. 2011. Jurnal enggunaan uji Mann-Whitney pada analisis pengaruh pelatihan wiraniaga dalam penjualan produk baru baru. Vol.2 No.2 November 2011:751-762. Binus University.
[16] Sugiono. 2015. Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&B. Alfabeta: Bandung
[17] Tandra, H. 2017. Segala sesuatu yang harus anda ketahui tentang diabetes. Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Jakarta.
[18] Wantania ,J. J.E. 2015. Hipertensi dalam kehamilan. Bagian Obstetri dan Ginekologi FK UNSRAT Manado.
[19] World Health Organization (WHO). 2019. Deafness and hearing loss. [Cited 2021 April4],Availablefrom:http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/e/