Peer Review Process Each manuscript is initially reviewed by the Editors for basic compliance. If it meets the required standard, it is sent for a Double-Blind Peer Review by at least two reviewers selected based on their expertise. The results of the review may be:

1. Accepted with no correction.

2. Accepted with minor revisions.

3. Accepted with major revisions.

4. Rejected. The corresponding author is given the opportunity to correct the article based on the suggestions received. The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection is provided to the author in writing.

 

 

Peer Review Process Setiap naskah yang masuk akan melalui seleksi awal oleh Editor untuk memastikan kesesuaian dengan fokus dan skope jurnal. Jika memenuhi standar, naskah akan dikirim ke minimal dua orang Mitra Bestari (Reviewer) yang ahli di bidangnya menggunakan sistem Double-Blind Peer Review (identitas penulis dan penelaah saling dirahasiakan). Hasil peninjauan dapat berupa:

1. Accepted with no correction (Diterima tanpa revisi).

2. Accepted with minor revisions (Revisi minor).

3. Accepted with major revisions (Revisi mayor).

4. Rejected (Ditolak). Editor memiliki hak akhir untuk memutuskan penerbitan naskah berdasarkan saran dari para penelaah.