FACULTY MEMBERS’ TECHNOLOGICAL PROFICIENCY, SUPPORT AND OBSTACLES
Abstrak
The advent of flexible online learning because of the pandemic has challenged Higher Education Institutions to think of innovative, creative, and effective ways to deliver lessons online. Video-based learning modules have become necessary for faculty members to deliver their online classes. With this, the researchers assessed the technological proficiency, support, and obstacles of the Department of Arts and Sciences (DOAS) faculty in producing these instructional videos. Through a survey administered among the participants from different subject clusters of the department, findings showed that most respondents are proficient in operating a camera and can execute various camera shots, angles, and movements. However, they are not well-versed in the concept of camera exposure which could improve footage quality. Respondents are also proficient in editing their instructional videos by adding music, voice-over, texts, and sound effects.
There is little training experienced in making instructional videos as respondents claimed, although they have access to technology which allows them to create such videos. Respondents are divided in receiving further training; some expressed a positive attitude towards it while the others saw obstacles such as the availability of gadgets and software, time amidst their full-time work, and being new to concepts on videography. Researchers recommended a video-based learning module that allows for flexible learning among the faculty members to further improve instructional videos given the constraints expressed.
Referensi
[2] O. Lasekan and M. Godoy, "Towards a sustainable local development of instructional material: An impact assessment of locally produced videos on EFL learners’ skills and individual difference factors," Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, p. 2075, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02075
[3] S. M. Chit, K. M. Yap, and A. Ahmad, "Multi-sensory learning framework for visually impaired learners: Use of 3D, haptic, audio, olfactory media," *Multimedia Tools and Applications*, pp. 1-13, 2024. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11042-024-18249-1
[4] B. Gold, C. Pfirrmann, and M. Holodynski, "Promoting professional vision of classroom management through different analytic perspectives in video-based learning environments," Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 431-447, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120963681
[5] P. M. Rasi and S. Poikela, "A review of video triggers and video production in higher education and continuing education PBL settings," *Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning*, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 7, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1609
[6] R. C. Choe, Z. Scuric, E. Eshkol, S. Cruser, A. Arndt, R. Cox, and R. H. Crosbie, "Student satisfaction and learning outcomes in asynchronous online lecture videos," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 18, no. 4, ar55, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0171
[7] Y. Ananda, H. Rahmatan, and I. Huda, "Application of the video-assisted problem-based learning model to increase student learning motivation in virus material," Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 6230-6237, 2023. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4766
[8] Ou, C., Joyner, D.A., & Goel, A.K. (2019). Designing and developing video lessons for online learning: A seven-principle model. Online Learning, 23(2), 82-104. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1449 https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1218394.pdf
[9] S. Castillo, K. Calvitti, J. Shoup, M. Rice, H. Lubbock, and K. H. Oliver, "Production processes for creating educational videos," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 20, no. 2, es7, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0120
[10] E. FitzPatrick and D. McKeown, "How to use audio feedback to improve students’ writing quality," Teaching Exceptional Children, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 12-22, 2020.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059920908901
[11] G. Eriksson, "Promoting extreme fitness regimes through the communicative affordances of reality makeover television: a multimodal critical discourse analysis," Critical Studies in Media Communication, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 408-426, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2022.2091153
[12] S. Kelby, The Digital Photography Book, vol. 1. Rocky Nook, Inc., 2020.
[13] J. L. Absolor, E. L. Morla, G. M. C. Villanueva, M. J. Yacap, and J. R. Bueno, "The Preparedness of a Philippine Higher Education Institution on the Implementation of Flexible Learning (FL)," *Technium Soc. Sci. J.*, vol. 32, p. 102, 2022.
[14] P. Lange, *Thanks for Watching: An Anthropological Study of Video Sharing on YouTube*. University Press of Colorado, 2019. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/22465/1007718.pdf;sequence=1
[15] Montgomery, T. R. (2022). How do we use creative and personal memories for creative communication?. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/1223/
[16] J. Huang, Y. Wang, and F. Teng, "Understanding changes in teacher beliefs and identity formation: A case study of three novice teachers in Hong Kong," Teaching Education, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 193-207, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2019.1693535
[17] S. Castillo, K. Calvitti, J. Shoup, M. Rice, H. Lubbock, and K. H. Oliver, "Production processes for creating educational videos," CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 20, no. 2, es7, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0120
